Machine Learning-Enabled Performance Optimization of Wavelength-Switched Networks
Keywords:
machine learning; wavelength-switched networks; optical network optimization; data center interconnects; resilience; sustainability; governanceAbstract
Wavelength-switched optical networks have long offered deterministic capacity, low latency, and high spectral efficiency, but their static provisioning models struggle with the dynamic traffic patterns of cloud, data center, and edge infrastructures. Machine learning introduces a promising control and optimization layer that can infer traffic behavior, predict quality of transmission, allocate wavelengths, and reconfigure optical paths with limited human intervention. This paper examines machine learning enabled performance optimization of wavelength-switched networks from a system-level perspective. It argues that optimization is not merely a computational problem but a socio-technical challenge involving architecture, operations, governance, sustainability, robustness, and fairness. The discussion first reviews the architectural foundations of wavelength switching, including reconfigurable optical add-drop multiplexers, elastic spectrum assignment, and intra-data center interconnects. It then analyzes how supervised learning, reinforcement learning, and probabilistic inference can improve routing, spectrum allocation, failure recovery, and energy management. Particular attention is given to structural trade-offs among latency, blocking probability, spectral efficiency, capital expenditure, and operational complexity. The paper also considers deployment constraints, telemetry requirements, model lifecycle management, and cross-domain lessons from software-defined networking and AI safety. It concludes that machine learning can enhance wavelength-switched network performance only when embedded within accountable governance frameworks, robust monitoring systems, and sustainability-aware planning. The central contribution is a critical synthesis that connects algorithmic optimization to infrastructure policy, fairness, and long-term resilience.
References
1. Saleh, A. A. M., & Simmons, J. M. (2011). Technology and architecture to enable the explosive growth of the internet. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(1), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2011.5681026
2. Winzer, P. J., Neilson, D. T., & Chraplyvy, A. R. (2018). Fiber-optic transmission and networking: The previous 20 and the next 20 years. Optics Express, 26(18), 24190–24239. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.024190
3. Jinno, M., Takara, H., Kozicki, B., Tsukishima, Y., Sone, Y., & Matsuoka, S. (2009). Spectrum-efficient and scalable elastic optical path network: Architecture, benefits, and enabling technologies. IEEE Communications Magazine, 47(11), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2009.5307468
4. Gerstel, O., Jinno, M., Lord, A., & Yoo, S. J. B. (2012). Elastic optical networking: A new dawn for the optical layer? IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(2), s12–s20. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2012.6146481
5. Kachris, C., & Tomkos, I. (2012). A survey on optical interconnects for data centers. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 14(4), 1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2011.122111.00069
6. Farrington, N., Porter, G., Radhakrishnan, S., Bazzaz, H. H., Subramanya, V., Fainman, Y., Papen, G., & Vahdat, A. (2010). Helios: A hybrid electrical/optical switch architecture for modular data centers. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 40(4), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1145/1851182.1851223
7. Zhou, Z., Dzieciol, H., Clark, K., Luo, Y., Richardson, D., Poletti, F., ... & Liu, Z. (2023). Low-latency wavelength-switched clock-synchronized intra-data center interconnects enabled by hollow core fiber. Optics Express, 31(15), 24739-24748.
8. Mata, J., de Miguel, I., Durán, R. J., Merayo, N., Singh, S. K., Jukan, A., & Chamania, M. (2018). Artificial intelligence (AI) methods in optical networks: A comprehensive survey. Optical Switching and Networking, 28, 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osn.2017.12.002
9. Musumeci, F., Rottondi, C., Nag, A., Macaluso, I., Zibar, D., Ruffini, M., & Tornatore, M. (2019). An overview on application of machine learning techniques in optical networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(2), 1383–1408. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2018.2880039
10. Rottondi, C., Barletta, L., Giusti, A., & Tornatore, M. (2018). Machine-learning method for quality of transmission prediction of unestablished lightpaths. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 10(2), A286–A297. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.10.00A286
11. Alvizu, R., Maier, G., Kukreja, N., Pattavina, A., Morro, R., Capello, A., & Cavazzoni, C. (2017). Comprehensive survey on T-SDN: Software-defined networking for transport networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(4), 2232–2283. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2715220
12. Klinkowski, M., & Walkowiak, K. (2011). Routing and spectrum allocation in elastic optical networks: A tutorial. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 13(3), 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2011.050311.00088
13. Shalf, J. (2020). The future of computing beyond Moore's Law. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 378(2166), 20190061. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0061
14. Masanet, E., Shehabi, A., Lei, N., Smith, S., & Koomey, J. (2020). Recalibrating global data center energy-use estimates. Science, 367(6481), 984–986. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba3758
15. Puttnam, B. J., Rademacher, G., & Luís, R. S. (2021). Space-division multiplexing for optical fiber communications. Optica, 8(9), 1186–1203. https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.427631
16. Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., & Mané, D. (2016). Concrete problems in AI safety. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565.
17. Sculley, D., Holt, G., Golovin, D., Davydov, E., Phillips, T., Ebner, D., Chaudhary, V., Young, M., Crespo, J.-F., & Dennison, D. (2015). Hidden technical debt in machine learning systems. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 28, 2503–2511.
18. Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716679679. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679
19. Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
20. Crawford, K. (2021). The atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.
21. Kachris, C., Bergman, K., & Tomkos, I. (2012). Optical interconnects for future data center networks. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4630-9
22. Boutaba, R., Salahuddin, M. A., Limam, N., Ayoubi, S., Shahriar, N., Estrada-Solano, F., & Caicedo, O. M. (2018). A comprehensive survey on machine learning for networking: Evolution, applications and research opportunities. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 9(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13174-018-0087-2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Computer Science and Engineering Transactions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
