Multimodal Large Language Agents for Real-World Interactive Applications
Keywords:
multimodal agents; large language models; interactive systems; system architecture; governance; robustness; fairness; sustainability; deployment infrastructure; socio-technical systemsAbstract
Multimodal large language agents represent a convergence of foundation models, interactive perception, tool use, and autonomous control in ways that increasingly shape real-world applications. Unlike conventional language systems that operate primarily over text, these agents integrate visual, auditory, spatial, and procedural signals into continuous decision loops, allowing them to act within physical and digital environments. This paper examines the system-level architecture, deployment infrastructure, governance requirements, and socio-technical implications of such agents. It argues that the central challenge is not merely model scale or modality fusion, but the design of reliable, sustainable, and accountable interactive systems that can operate under uncertainty. Architectural trade-offs include latency versus deliberation, centralization versus edge distribution, closed versus open tool ecosystems, and general-purpose reasoning versus domain-specific constraints. The paper further analyzes robustness, fairness, accessibility, and sustainability as interdependent properties rather than isolated metrics. It discusses how multimodal agents alter institutional workflows, regulatory expectations, and the economics of compute and maintenance. Through cross-domain comparisons spanning robotics, healthcare, education, public services, and industrial automation, the analysis shows that real-world deployment requires layered safeguards, human oversight, and lifecycle governance. The conclusion emphasizes that multimodal large language agents should be understood as infrastructural systems whose legitimacy depends on transparency, contestability, inclusive design, and long-term operational resilience. The paper contributes a systems-oriented agenda for researchers, engineers, and policymakers seeking to move beyond prototype demonstrations toward durable interactive applications.
References
1. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5998–6008.
2. Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., ... & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877–1901.
3. Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., ... & Liang, P. (2021). On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258.
4. Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., ... & Sutskever, I. (2021). Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, 139, 8748–8763.
5. Alayrac, J.-B., Donahue, J., Luc, P., Miech, A., Barr, I., Hasson, Y., ... & Simonyan, K. (2022). Flamingo: A visual language model for few-shot learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 23716–23736.
6. Li, J., Li, D., Savarese, S., & Hoi, S. (2023). BLIP-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models. Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, 202, 19730–19742.
7. Driess, D., Xia, F., Sajjadi, M. S. M., Lynch, C., Chowdhery, A., Ichter, B., ... & Florence, P. (2023). PaLM-E: An embodied multimodal language model. Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, 202, 8469–8488.
8. Jiang, H., Xin, G., Huang, Y., Zhu, G., Zhang, J., Lin, X., ... & Cao, Z. (2026). AgentOmnia: Scaling Agentic Models for Full-Scenario Applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.23124.
9. Yao, S., Zhao, J., Yu, D., Du, N., Shafran, I., Narasimhan, K., & Cao, Y. (2023). ReAct: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. International Conference on Learning Representations.
10. Schick, T., Dwivedi-Yu, J., Dessì, R., Raileanu, R., Lomeli, M., Hambro, E., ... & Scialom, T. (2023). Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36.
11. Wu, Q., Bansal, G., Zhang, J., Wu, Y., Li, B., Zhu, E., ... & Wang, C. (2023). AutoGen: Enabling next-gen LLM applications via multi-agent conversation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08155.
12. Wang, G., Xie, Y., Jiang, Y., Mandlekar, A., Xiao, C., Zhu, Y., Fan, L., & Anandkumar, A. (2023). Voyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16291.
13. Ahn, M., Brohan, A., Brown, N., Chebotar, Y., Cortes, O., David, B., ... & Zeng, A. (2022). Do as I can, not as I say: Grounding language in robotic affordances. Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Robot Learning, 205, 287–318.
14. Liang, J., Huang, W., Xia, F., Xu, P., Hausman, K., Ichter, B., ... & Zeng, A. (2023). Code as policies: Language model programs for embodied control. Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, 202, 19730–19742.
15. Bubeck, S., Chandrasekaran, V., Eldan, R., Gehrke, J., Horvitz, E., Kamar, E., ... & Zhang, Y. (2023). Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12712.
16. Weidinger, L., Uesato, J., Rauh, M., Griffin, C., Huang, P.-S., Mellor, J., ... & Gabriel, I. (2022). Taxonomy of risks posed by language models. Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 214–229.
17. Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623.
18. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35.
19. Sculley, D., Holt, G., Golovin, D., Davydov, E., Phillips, T., Ebner, D., ... & Dennison, D. (2015). Hidden technical debt in machine learning systems. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 28, 2503–2511.
20. Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Computer Science and Engineering Transactions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
