Bayesian Flow-Based Peptide Design for Antimicrobial Resistance Mitigation and Therapeutic Discovery

Authors

  • Aishani Sule Department of Computer Science, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA. Author
  • Elsbeth Wulf Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA. Author
  • Serafin Padron Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. Author

Keywords:

Bayesian flow; antimicrobial peptides; antimicrobial resistance; generative protein design; socio-technical systems; biosecurity governance; clinical translation; sustainable manufacturing

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance has become one of the most consequential socio-technical failures of contemporary medicine, linking clinical overuse, agricultural practices, weak diagnostics, uneven regulatory capacity, and global inequities in access to care. Antimicrobial peptides offer a promising therapeutic class because they can disrupt microbial membranes, modulate immunity, and evade some conventional resistance pathways, yet their discovery remains limited by sequence space, toxicity, instability, and costly wet-lab validation. This paper examines Bayesian flow-based peptide design as a system-level strategy for accelerating antimicrobial resistance mitigation and therapeutic discovery. Rather than treating generative modeling as a purely computational exercise, the analysis positions Bayesian flow within a larger architecture that includes multi-modal molecular representation, all-atom rationalization, closed-loop experimental validation, manufacturing infrastructure, clinical translation, biosecurity governance, and equitable access. The discussion emphasizes structural trade-offs among generative fidelity, interpretability, computational cost, data provenance, and regulatory accountability. It also considers robustness under distribution shift, fairness in global health deployment, dual-use risk, environmental sustainability, and policy mechanisms for responsible innovation. The central argument is that Bayesian flow-based peptide design can meaningfully contribute to antimicrobial resistance mitigation only if it is embedded in durable socio-technical systems that connect model development to laboratory verification, production capacity, surveillance, and public governance. The paper concludes with forward-looking priorities for interdisciplinary research and policy.

References

1. Ventola, C. L. (2015). The antibiotic resistance crisis: Part 1: Causes and threats. P & T, 40(4), 277–283.

2. Laxminarayan, R., Duse, A., Wattal, C., Zaidi, A. K. M., Wertheim, H. F. L., Sumpradit, N., Vlieghe, E., Hara, G. L., Gould, I. M., Goossens, H., Greko, C., So, A. D., Bigdeli, M., Tomson, G., Woodhouse, W., Ombaka, E., Peralta, A. Q., Qamar, F. N., Mir, F., ... Cars, O. (2013). Antibiotic resistance—the need for a global solutions. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 13(12), 1057–1098.

3. World Health Organization. (2015). Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. World Health Organization.

4. Fjell, C. D., Hiss, J. A., Hancock, R. E. W., & Schneider, G. (2012). Designing antimicrobial peptides: Form follows function. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 11(1), 37–51.

5. Mahlapuu, M., Håkansson, J., Ringstad, L., & Björn, C. (2016). Antimicrobial peptides: An emerging category of therapeutic agents. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 6, 194.

6. Torres, M. D. T., Sothiselvam, S., Lu, T. K., & de la Fuente-Nunez, C. (2019). Peptide design principles for antimicrobial applications. Journal of Molecular Biology, 431(18), 3547–3567.

7. Porto, W. F., Pires, Á. S., & Franco, O. L. (2017). Computational tools for exploring sequence databases as a resource for antimicrobial peptides. Biotechnology Advances, 35(3), 337–349.

8. Madani, A., McCann, B., Naik, N., Keskar, N. S., Anand, N., Eguchi, R. R., Huang, P. S., & Socher, R. (2020). ProGen: Language modeling for protein generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.03497.

9. Alley, E. C., Khimulya, G., Biswas, S., AlQuraishi, M., & Church, G. M. (2019). Unified rational protein engineering with sequence-based deep representation learning. Nature Methods, 16(12), 1315–1322.

10. Wu, H., Song, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Z., Zhou, H., Ma, W. Y., & Liu, J. (2026). Rationalized All-Atom Protein Design with Unified Multi-Modal Bayesian Flow. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 38, 3019-3050.

11. Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., Bridgland, A., Meyer, C., Kohl, S. A. A., Ballard, A. J., Cowie, A., Romera-Paredes, B., Nikolov, S., Jain, R., Adler, J., ... Hassabis, D. (2021). Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature, 596(7873), 583–589.

12. Watson, J. L., Juergens, D., Bennett, N. R., Trippe, B. L., Yim, J., Eisenach, H. E., Ahern, W., Borst, A. J., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., Wicky, B. I. M., Hanikel, N., Pellock, S. J., Courbet, A., Sheffler, W., Wang, J., Venkatesh, P., Sappington, I., Torres, S. V., ... Baker, D. (2023). De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion. Nature, 620(7976), 1089–1100.

13. Sohl-Dickstein, J., Weiss, E. A., Maheswaranathan, N., & Ganguli, S. (2015). Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, 37, 2256–2265.

14. Ho, J., Jain, A., & Abbeel, P. (2020). Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 6840–6851.

15. Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2014). Auto-encoding variational Bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114.

16. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 27, 2672–2680.

17. Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56.

18. Rajkomar, A., Dean, J., & Kohane, I. (2019). Machine learning in medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 380(14), 1347–1358.

19. Char, D. S., Shah, N. H., & Magnus, D. (2018). Implementing machine learning in health care—Addressing ethical challenges. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(11), 981–983.

20. Vayena, E., Blasimme, A., & Cohen, I. G. (2018). Machine learning in medicine: Addressing ethical challenges. PLoS Medicine, 15(11), e1002689.

21. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). Biodefense in the age of synthetic biology. National Academies Press.

22. Oye, K. A., Esvelt, K., Appleton, E., Catteruccia, F., Church, G., Kuiken, T., Lightfoot, S. B.-Y., McNamara, J., Smidler, A., & Collins, J. J. (2014). Regulating gene drives. Science, 345(6197), 626–628.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-15