Energy-Efficient Privacy-Preserving Neural Networks for Resource-Constrained IoT Devices Using Secure Computation
Keywords:
secure computation; privacy-preserving machine learning; internet of things; energy efficiency; edge intelligence; federated learning; homomorphic encryption; differential privacy; governance; sustainabilityAbstract
Artificial intelligence at the edge is increasingly embedded in consumer, industrial, medical, and civic infrastructures, yet many internet-of-things devices operate under severe limits in energy, memory, bandwidth, and thermal headroom. Running neural networks locally can reduce latency and communication, but it also exposes sensitive data to device compromise and raises questions about whether privacy can be preserved without sacrificing operational sustainability. This paper examines energy-efficient privacy-preserving neural networks for resource-constrained internet-of-things devices through the lens of secure computation. Rather than treating cryptography, machine learning optimization, and infrastructure governance as separate domains, the analysis frames them as coupled design choices that shape system architecture, cost, robustness, and fairness. The discussion considers secure multi-party computation, homomorphic encryption, secret sharing, differential privacy, and federated learning, with attention to their energy profiles and deployment feasibility in edge and gateway environments. It then analyzes structural trade-offs among privacy guarantees, inference accuracy, latency, battery life, and communication overhead. The paper argues that practical deployments require hybrid protocols, model compression, reduced activation complexity, secure offloading, and policy mechanisms that clarify accountability across device manufacturers, network operators, cloud providers, and public institutions. Case illustrations from smart health, industrial monitoring, and urban sensing show that privacy and energy efficiency are not merely technical constraints but also governance and sustainability challenges. The conclusion outlines a research agenda for auditable, inclusive, and resource-aware secure neural computation at the edge.
References
1. Yao, A. C. (1982). Protocols for secure computations. In 23rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (pp. 160–164). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1982.38
2. Goldreich, O., Micali, S., & Wigderson, A. (1987). How to play any mental game. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (pp. 218–229). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/28395.28420
3. Beaver, D. (1991). Efficient multiparty protocols using circuit randomization. In J. Feigenbaum (Ed.), Advances in cryptology—CRYPTO '91 (pp. 420–432). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46766-1_34
4. Canetti, R. (2001). Universally composable security: A new paradigm for cryptographic protocols. In Proceedings 42nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (pp. 136–145). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.2001.959888
5. Damgård, I., Pastro, V., Smart, N., & Zakarias, S. (2012). Multiparty computation from somewhat homomorphic encryption. In R. Safavi-Naini & R. Canetti (Eds.), Advances in cryptology—CRYPTO 2012 (pp. 643–662). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32009-5_38
6. Gilad-Bachrach, R., Dowlin, N., Laine, K., Lauter, K., Naehrig, M., & Wernsing, J. (2016). CryptoNets: Applying neural networks to encrypted data with high throughput and accuracy. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 201–210). PMLR. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v48/gilad-bachrach16.html
7. Liu, J., Juuti, M., Lu, Y., & Asokan, N. (2017). Oblivious neural network predictions via MiniONN transformations. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 619–631). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3133956.3134056
8. Mohassel, P., & Zhang, Y. (2017). SecureML: A system for scalable privacy-preserving machine learning. In 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (pp. 19–38). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2017.12
9. Juvekar, C., Vaikuntanathan, V., & Chandrakasan, A. (2018). Gazelle: A low latency framework for secure neural network inference. In 27th USENIX Security Symposium (pp. 1651–1669). USENIX Association. https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity18/presentation/juvekar
10. Riazi, M. S., Weinert, C., Tkachenko, O., Songhori, E. M., Schneider, T., & Koushanfar, F. (2018). Chameleon: A hybrid secure computation framework for machine learning applications. In Proceedings of the 2018 on Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 707–721). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196494.3196522
11. Han, S., Mao, H., & Dally, W. J. (2016). Deep compression: Compressing deep neural networks with pruning, trained quantization and Huffman coding. In 4th International Conference on Learning Representations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.00149
12. Howard, A. G., Zhu, M., Chen, B., Kalenichenko, D., Wang, W., Weyand, T., Andreetto, M., & Adam, H. (2017). MobileNets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861. https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.04861
13. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Arcas, B. A. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (pp. 1273–1282). PMLR. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v54/mcmahan17a.html
14. Bonawitz, K., Ivanov, V., Kreuter, B., Marcedone, A., McMahan, H. B., Patel, S., Ramage, D., Segal, A., & Seth, K. (2017). Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 1175–1191). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3133956.3133982
15. Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2016). Deep learning with differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 308–318). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2976749.2978318
16. Peng, Hongwu, et al. "Rrnet: Towards relu-reduced neural network for two-party computation based private inference." arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02292 (2023).
17. Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., Bonawitz, K., Charles, Z., Cormode, G., Cummings, R., D'Oliveira, R. G. L., Eichner, H., El Rouayheb, S., Evans, D., Gardner, J., Garrett, Z., Gascón, A., Ghazi, B., Gibbons, P. B., ... Zhao, S. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1–2), 1–210. https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000083
18. Dwork, C. (2006). Differential privacy. In M. Bugliesi, B. Preneel, V. Sassone, & I. Wegener (Eds.), Automata, languages and programming (pp. 1–12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/11787006_1
19. Xu, R., Baracaldo, N., Zhou, Y., Anwar, A., & Ludwig, H. (2019). HybridAlpha: An efficient approach for privacy-preserving federated learning. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security (pp. 13–23). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3338501.3357371
20. Papernot, N., Abadi, M., Erlingsson, U., Goodfellow, I., & Talwar, K. (2017). Semi-supervised knowledge transfer for deep learning from private training data. In 5th International Conference on Learning Representations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.05755
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Computer Science and Engineering Transactions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
